Category Archives: Seminar 2 Dialogue

For The Love of Pete

MODULE FOUR: DIALOGUE SEMINAR VIDEO MODULE              For The Love of Pete (Item #203136) HOMEWORK Discussion Questions: 5.02 How do conversations make a difference in the lives of Pete and Judy? MODULE FIVE: YOUR DIAGNOSTIC TOOL RESULTS             Office of … Continue reading

Posted in Seminar 2 Dialogue | Leave a comment

If conversations change lives, then a working definition of a person’s micro-mission field would be all those with whom that person had conversation on a regular basis.

E. If conversations change lives, then a working definition of a person’s micro-mission field would be all those with whom that person had conversation on a regular basis. F. A social system has a structure which gives regularity and stability … Continue reading

Posted in Seminar 2 Dialogue | Leave a comment

Five Steps in Adoption: Diffusion research identifies five main steps in the innovation decision process which occur in a time ordered sequence

C. Five Steps in Adoption: Diffusion research identifies five main steps in the innovation decision process which occur in a time ordered sequence: knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation and confirmation. For the potential adopter, the purpose of the process is to … Continue reading

Posted in Seminar 2 Dialogue | Leave a comment

Diffusion is defined as “the process by which an innovation is communicated through certain channels over time among the members of a social system.”

HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENTS: 2.1 JOURNAL: Record your reflections and document your answers to the Questions for a Better Understanding found on page 139 with regard to this module. MODULE THREE: THE DIFFUSION CHANGE PROCESS Section One: Basic Concepts OBSERVATIONS, QUOTES AND … Continue reading

Posted in Seminar 2 Dialogue | Leave a comment

Information spreads on the other side of the chasm by conversations between homophilous individuals that share kinship

F. BRIDGING TO THE NEXT CATEGORY:                 Information spreads on the other side of the chasm by conversations between homophilous individuals that share kinship and enjoy talking with each other. Media presentations favored by visionaries, such as advertising or sermons, … Continue reading

Posted in Seminar 2 Dialogue | Leave a comment

CROSSING THE CHASM: From Visionary Minority to Pragmatic Majority

G. CROSSING THE CHASM             The pragmatists that make up the Early Majority prefer innovations which are continuous improvements on existing comfortable norms and which do not require changes in behavior.[1] Innovators and Early Adopters are excited about innovations that … Continue reading

Posted in Seminar 2 Dialogue | Leave a comment

Early Adopters or Visionaries

Section Three: Early Adopters or Visionaries Pastor: There’s a light bulb burnt out in the sanctuary. Can you help? Early Adopter: Has anyone analyzed whether it’s in our best interests to spend the extra money on those long lasting bulbs? … Continue reading

Posted in Seminar 2 Dialogue | Leave a comment

HOMEWORK Discussion Questions: Innovators

HOMEWORK Discussion Questions: 2.03. Who do you know in this adopter category, inside and outside the church? 2.04. For Innovators inside your church, what are their passionate interests? Where do they look for new ideas? 2.05. What would a church … Continue reading

Posted in Seminar 2 Dialogue | Leave a comment

Innovators are always searching for someone with whom they can communicate about their enthusiasms.

G. As comparatively few people have an interest in new ideas, Innovators are always searching for someone with whom they can communicate about their enthusiasms. As this communication requires a technical, specialized vocabulary, someone both interested and able to talk … Continue reading

Posted in Seminar 2 Dialogue | Leave a comment

Innovators will be perceived as living both inside and outside their cultures of origin, functionally linking two or more worlds and advocating diversity and pluralism.

D. Innovators will be perceived as living both inside and outside their cultures of origin, functionally linking two or more worlds and advocating diversity and pluralism.[1] Due to their variation from communal norms, Rogers states that the “most innovative member … Continue reading

Posted in Seminar 2 Dialogue | Leave a comment